First was a photography project by Dina Goldstein. She says:
These works place Fairy Tale characters in modern day scenarios. In all of the images the Princess is placed in an environment that articulates her conflict. The '...happily ever after' is replaced with a realistic outcome and addresses current issues.
The project was inspired by my observation of three-year-old girls, who were developing an interest in Disney's Fairy tales. As a new mother I have been able to get a close up look at the phenomenon of young girls fascinated with Princesses and their desire to dress up like them. The Disney versions almost always have sad beginning, with an overbearing female villain, and the end is predictably a happy one. The Prince usually saves the day and makes the victimized young beauty into a Princess.
As a young girl, growing up abroad, I was not exposed to Fairy tales. These new discoveries lead to my fascination with the origins of Fairy tales. I explored the original brothers Grimm's stories and found that they have very dark and sometimes gruesome aspects, many of which were changed by Disney. I began to imagine Disney's perfect Princesses juxtaposed with real issues that were affecting women around me, such as illness, addiction and self-image issues.
(left: Goldstein's rendition of Belle from Beauty and the Beast)See her project here: http://www.lifelounge.com/Fallen-princesses-by-Dina-Goldstein.aspx
Then I received, from Brasscheck, this video:
And finally, today, Funny or Die tweets "Lion King on Sega is either accidentally impossible or it's teaching kids that everything in Africa can kill you instantly"

So what is this ominous voice that is speaking out about Disney's monopolization of children's view of race, women and human relationships? Just coincidence or Eisner up to something I've missed lately?
Whatever it is, it's good to see that the realization about corporate child entertainment is finally being questioned - although not by the masses, but the murmur is definitely there.







